| Functional vs Structural - Case Study #2 |
| |
|
|
- Chip provider that must evaluate test chips and first silicon.
|
|
|
- Comparison of functional methodology versus structural
methodology.
|
|
|
- Understanding coverage, tradeoffs, techniques and schedules.
|
|
|
- Application of both functional and structural vectors on identical parts
and on both structural and functional testers.
|
|
|
- Application of scan on traditional functional testers on a test floor.
|
|
|
- Experiments conducted in desktop environment to compare and
contrast both functional vectors applied on functional testers and
structural vectors on structural testers.
|
|
|
- While the desktop structural tester is designed primarily for structural
testing, it is also a very capable machine for initial silicon validation
using functional test patterns as long as those patterns meet the
reduced edge-set handling requirement. This technique provides a
cost effective method for silicon bring-up, working in conjunction and
in parallel with silicon debug on big iron ATE.
|
|
|
|
| ^ Back to top |
| Production Probe - Case Study #3 |
| |
|
|
- Chip (IDM) provider that must sustain full production probe.
|
|
|
- Production wafer probe for devices with strong DFT.
|
|
|
- Sustained throughput at the lowest cost.
|
|
|
- Using a low-cost, DFT tester.
|
|
|
- A functional big-iron tester.
|
|
|
- Lower asset cost of equipment, lower operational cost, small
footprint, and meets or exceeds all requirements for the probe
insertion. Also, it fits within the capabilities and limitations of testing
through probe needles.
|
|
|
- As an added benefit, the chosen platform accelerated test
development and deployment.
|
|
|
|
| ^ Back to top |
| Test Program Development - Case Study #4 |
| |
|
|
- Chip (IDM) providers that must develop the test program for
production test.
|
|
|
- Rapid development and validation of production test program.
|
|
|
- Reduced time-to-test program.
|
|
|
- Using the desktop and production-sized tester as a vector
development vehicle in conjunction with EDA tool links to prove out
ATPG vectors; restricted functional vectors (meeting edge set
restrictions); and to provide fail information that allows diagnosis to
be conducted (to fix vectors).
|
|
|
- Test program development on a big-iron functional tester.
|
|
|
- Reducing the time to validate vectors and turn them into test program
components.
|
|
|
- Ocelot ZFP - Best Test Coverage for New, High Performance SoC Devices
- Ocelot - The Most Cost-Effective Manufacturing Test System for Complex SOC Chips
- FlopPlot Analysis Software
- Visually Identify and Diagnose IC Faults Faster
|
| ^ Back to top |